When "I Know My Audience" Becomes "Who Am I Actually Serving?"
During our persona development session, Tereza kept describing different types of clients: the career changer worried about credentials, the aspiring manager unsure how to position themselves, the strategically invisible professional struggling to get heard, the skill-paralyzed overwhelmed by learning options. I kept listening for the pattern.
Then it hit me...she wasn't describing different people. She was describing the same person at different moments in their career journey.
And that recognition would unlock a core principle of her methodology.
But first, we had to challenge an assumption Tereza had already made about who she served.
The Broad Definition
Tereza had already defined her target audience. She'd written it down:
"Senior Data Professionals: Someone with work experience in the data domain or near it. Also people with interest in leading even if not officially, by having an impact in their work."
Clear. Comprehensive. But also... broad.
Before our second brand promise workshop, she'd sent over detailed information expanding on this definition. She'd organized her clients into clear categories:
- The Career Changer : Someone transitioning into data science, worried about lack of formal credentials.
- The Aspiring Manager : A senior IC wanting to move into leadership but unsure how to position themselves.
- The Strategically Invisible Professional : Technically brilliant but struggling to get heard at the decision-making table.
- The Skill Development Paralyzed: Overwhelmed by all the things they think they need to learn.
On paper, this looked comprehensive. Four distinct types, each with different anxieties, different desired outcomes, different career inflection points.
But here's the problem: when you're trying to message to four different audiences, you end up messaging to no one.
Your website copy becomes generic. Your program positioning gets muddy. Your value proposition tries to be everything to everyone.
And more importantly, you miss what's actually connecting all these "different" people.
The Multiple Audience Question
We were discussing how to position her group workshop. Tereza started listing the different types of people she could serve:
Tereza: "I think it's data career changers. I work with people who switch from academia...which was my own experience...and also people switching within industry. I went through product owner, data scientist, data engineer, team lead."
She was listing her expertise, showing the range of transitions she could support. All valid. All true.
But I kept listening for the pattern underneath.
Use Cases vs. Personas
As I reviewed everything she'd sent (the client descriptions, the pain points, the different "types" of people she worked with) something clicked.
Izumi: "To me, the information you gave was more like use cases...meaning it could be the same person with different variations of what they might experience. When you think about it, these use cases you outlined could all be one person going through different phases of their career. So after really thinking about whether there are multiple personas, I concluded there's actually one core persona experiencing different situations."
Tereza: "Mhm." (the lightbulb showing up)
This was the excavation moment. Not four different audiences. Not multiple persona types.
One person. Different stages.
Same Problem, Different Stages
Let me show you what I was seeing:
The "Career Changer" at 28:
-
- Transitioning into data science from another field
- Worried about lack of formal credentials
- Technically capable but unsure how to prove it
- Core problem: Technically capable, strategically invisible
The "Strategically Invisible Professional" at 32:
-
- Built strong technical track record
- Models work but don't get to production
- Struggling to get heard at the decision-making table
- Core problem: Technically capable, strategically invisible
The "Skill Development Paralyzed" at 34:
-
- Overwhelmed by all the things she thinks she needs to learn
- Freezing instead of advancing
- Can't see the value she already has
- Core problem: Technically capable, strategically invisible
The "Aspiring Manager" at 36:
-
- Senior IC wanting to move into leadership
- Already doing leadership work unofficially
- Unsure how to position herself for the transition
- Core problem: Technically capable, strategically invisible
Same person. Same core challenge. Just at different points in her career journey.
She wasn't experiencing four different problems that needed four different solutions. She was experiencing one problem at different stages of career development.
And that recognition changed everything.
Making It Real: Meet Sara Turner
Instead of keeping this abstract, I created a real person.
Izumi: "This is a persona I put together based on everything I know so far. Think of this as a real existing person. Her name is Sara Turner. She's a senior data scientist, 32 years old, lives in Madrid. She has six years of data role experience, currently works as a senior data scientist at a mid-sized tech company. She has a master's in computer science but is self-taught in data science."

Sara Turner became the anchor.
Her background:
- Started as software developer
- Moved to data analyst
- Now senior data scientist
- Third company, five-person data team
- Reports to Head of Product
- Salary: €75,000-85,000
Her current situation:
- Satisfaction level: 5/10 - "I'm good at what I do, but something feels missing"
- Built several successful models, but only 40% make it to production
- Peers respect her technical skills
- Management sees her as "the person who does data stuff"
- 18 months in current role, quickly mastered technical challenges
- Now seeking strategic growth
Her frustration: "I know I could do more if given the chance, but I can't seem to break through to that next level where my insights actually shape decisions."
Technically brilliant. Strategically invisible.
What This Clarity Unlocked
Creating Sara Turner wasn't just an academic exercise. It fundamentally changed how Tereza could position her work.
Before:
- Messaging: "I help career changers, aspiring managers, strategically invisible professionals, and skill-paralyzed data professionals"
- Positioning: Broad, trying to appeal to multiple audiences
- Program structure: Unclear which "type" would benefit most
- Value proposition: Scattered across different use cases
After:
- Messaging: "I help Data Diplomats like Sara Turner"
- Positioning: Specific, speaking to one person at different stages
- Program structure: Clear journey from technically brilliant to strategically visible
- Value proposition: Singular transformation, applicable at any career stage
But here's what made this discovery even more powerful:
It wasn't just about targeting clarity. It was about recognizing a pattern that would reveal something fundamental about Tereza's entire methodology.
Because once we saw that Sara Turner at different stages was the same person with the same core problem, we started asking a different question:
What does Sara actually need at each stage?
And the answer to that question would unlock the core principle of the entire Data Diplomat Framework.
Is your coaching framework hiding in plain sight too?
A Quick Self-Check to See if Your Coaching Method Already Contains a Hidden Framework
Why This Matters: The Excavation Pattern Repeats
This chapter reveals another layer of the excavation process:
Chapter 2: The Data Diplomat framework was already there in Tereza's language. It just needed to be named.
Chapter 3: The core persona was already there in Tereza's work. It just needed to be recognized as one person instead of multiple audiences.
The pattern repeats: recognition over invention.
Tereza didn't need to create a new target audience. She needed to see clearly the one person she'd been serving all along.
And sometimes the biggest barrier to clarity isn't lack of information.
It's assumptions about what you already know.
What Happened Next
With Sara Turner clearly defined, we could move beyond targeting clarity to a deeper question:
What does Sara actually need to go from technically brilliant to strategically visible?
That question would lead to the most important methodology discovery of all.
Because Sara doesn't need more skills.
She needs to recognize the experience she already has.
The Excavation Principle:
Sometimes you think you know your audience, but what you've actually identified are use cases, not personas. And when you excavate deeper, you discover you're not serving multiple audiences, you're serving one person at different stages of the same journey.
-
- Chapter 1: When Success Does Not Equal Clarity
- Chapter 2: The “Data Diplomat” Moment
- Chapter 3: The Persona Discovery <<<YOU ARE HERE
- Chapter 4: The Experience Vs. Skills Discovery
- Chapter 5: The Brutal Honesty Differentiator
- Chapter 6: Brand Promise - The North Star that guides everything
- Chapter 7: Mapping the Journey
Subscribe to my newslettter to continue reading the complete ChaosClarity™ Diary series!
See how invisible professional value gets transformed into strategic recognition through our conversations.



