When Your Client Hands You Their Framework Without Realizing It
About forty minutes into our first brand promise workshop, Tereza casually mentioned telling her clients they need to act like data diplomats. My consultant brain lit up immediately.
She had no idea she'd just named her entire methodology, or that she'd been living it for twenty years.
The Setup: Looking for the Pattern
We'd spent the first session mapping out her ideal clients: senior data professionals stuck at a career inflection point. Technically brilliant, strategically invisible. I could see the pattern clearly ... professionals who translate between technical data work and business strategy, who navigate stakeholder relationships without direct authority, who influence through relationship management rather than pure technical expertise.
But I needed a way to name them.
A concise term that would capture this unique professional identity. Something that wouldn't require repeating a three-paragraph description every time we talked about who Tereza serves.
That's when she said it.
The Moment: A Casual Reference That Changes Everything
I brought it up directly:
Izumi: "One thing I wanted to highlight because you mentioned it last time is the data diplomat concept. You talked about how you always say to people you have to become a diplomat, right?"
Tereza: “Yeah, I do have a talk about it at some point (with my clients).”
I pressed further:
Izumi: "That's a mindset, right? That people need to have in order to be a convincing, influential person that can move things and be impactful. I think you used that word—you only used that word just once during the call last time, but I think it's a very interesting and key aspect because it covers a lot of things. The word diplomat or being like a data diplomat."
This wasn't new language for her. It was already part of her vocabulary. Part of how she explained what data professionals need to succeed.
The Backstory: Twenty Years of Lived Experience
As we talked, Tereza explained where this language came from, specifically, her realization about working with non-technical stakeholders:
Tereza: “At some point you learn that they're not going to learn your language. If you want to be successful in a cross-functional company, you need to be like a diplomat."
They—the business leaders, the cross-functional partners, the executives who needed insights but spoke a different language. They weren't going to learn data science terminology. She needed to learn theirs.
She paused, then added:
Tereza: “I was even giving talks about this, you know, like the data diplomat.”
There it was. This wasn't something she'd invented on the spot. This was language born from her own career journey — from computer science PhD to head of data science at companies like XING and Free Now. From being the technical expert to becoming the person who could navigate complex organizational dynamics.
She'd been teaching this concept at conferences. Using it in her coaching. Living it in her own career transitions.
The methodology already existed. It just needed to be named as a framework.
The Hidden Framework: Teaching It Publicly, Missing It in Marketing
Here's the part that still gets me.
When Tereza completed her ChaosClarity™ Business Assessment before we started working together, the results came back: "Visionary but Scattered."
The specific findings?
-
- "Ineffective Branding → Weak Brand Identity"
- "Difficulty expressing your value clearly"
- "Scattered effort without clear traction"
- "Inability to Focus → Scattered Efforts"
Yet at the exact same time, literally during the same period when she was being diagnosed with branding issues, she was already giving conference talks about "the data diplomat" concept.
She wasn't struggling to express her value because she didn't have a clear value proposition. She was struggling because she had TWO completely different ways of expressing it:
The Public Tereza: Speaking at data science conferences (like code.talks , PyData etc) about how professionals need to become diplomats in cross-functional companies (see her talks here). Using vivid, memorable language. Teaching from lived experience. Drawing on twenty years of navigating technical and business worlds.
The Marketing Tereza: Generic career coach copy on her website. Professional but bland positioning. Safe language that could apply to anyone. The result of following multiple marketing programs that taught her to sound like everyone else.
The framework wasn't missing. It was WORKING — in her conference talks, in her client conversations, in the advice she gave when she wasn't overthinking it.
But it was invisible in her marketing because that's what program overload does. You collect so much advice about "building your brand" and "defining your positioning" that you stop recognizing what's already landing with your audience. You start looking for the framework you think you're supposed to have instead of excavating the one you've already been using.
Her website said "career coach" because that felt safe — professional, polished, like what the programs taught.
Her conference talks conveyed the concept of thinking like a "diplomat" because that was authentic—specific, memorable, born from actual experience.
This is the devastating irony of program overload: The very thing making you visible (your authentic expertise) gets buried under the very thing meant to help you get visible (generic marketing advice).
Tereza didn't need a new framework. She needed someone to point at the one she'd been teaching publicly and say: This. This is what makes you different. This is what people actually respond to.
The Data Diplomat concept wasn't hidden in some unexplored corner of her practice. It was hiding in plain sight—visible to everyone at conferences, invisible in her positioning, completely absent from her marketing.
Sometimes the problem isn't what you don't know. It's that you've learned to ignore what you do.
Is your coaching framework hiding in plain sight too?
A Quick Self-Check to See if Your Coaching Method Already Contains a Hidden Framework
The Recognition: Naming What Already Exists
I laid it out for her:
Izumi: "The next step is figuring out what words to use to describe and categorize them. We don't want to keep repeating this paragraph. To give them a name, I'm proposing 'Data Diplomats' — because you were saying it very clearly."
Tereza: “Yeah. I see...” ( getting her thoughts together)
Izumi: "And I think it really makes sense. Obviously it's yours...I mean you've been using it so it's not a new word for you."
Izumi: "You understand very well what you mean when you say people need to become diplomats ... you've been living that yourself. This term captures the unique role: professionals who translate between technical data work and business strategy, navigate stakeholder relationships without direct authority, and influence through relationship management."
These are mostly individual contributors—senior professionals without direct reports who still need to influence across the organization.
This was the excavation moment. I wasn't inventing anything. I was pointing at what she'd already been doing and saying: This. This is your framework.
The Depth: Understanding What It Really Means
But Tereza's response revealed something even deeper about the Data Diplomat reality:
Tereza: “Even people with authority might struggle to exercise it. They can exercise authority within their team, but when it comes to managing up... that's where middle management feels like being in a sandwich.”
Tereza's point was crucial: this isn't just about individual contributors without formal authority. Even managers with teams and titles struggle with the same diplomatic challenge. You can direct your team, but influencing upward and across? That requires an entirely different skillset.
And she painted the picture perfectly:
Tereza: “t's like being in a sandwich. From the bottom, people want you to be bottom-up. From the top, they want you to be top-down. When you're in middle management, you have to make everybody believe they're getting what they want.”
This is the diplomatic reality of data leadership — navigating competing demands while maintaining influence in all directions. Your team wants you to advocate upward for them. Your executives want you to drive execution downward. And you're stuck translating between both worlds.
There it was. The lived experience. The methodology she'd developed over decades of navigating this exact dynamic.
She didn't just know what data diplomacy meant intellectually. She'd lived it. At every level. As an individual contributor managing up without authority. As a manager stuck between technical teams and executive expectations. As a senior leader who understood both worlds because she'd walked the path herself.
Why This Matters: Methodology Recognition vs. Creation
This is where most coaches and consultants get it wrong. They think they need to create a framework. Invent new concepts. Come up with clever terminology that sounds smart.
But Tereza didn't need a new framework. She needed someone to recognize the one she'd already been using.
She'd been teaching "data diplomat" thinking at conferences. Using it in client conversations. Explaining it as a mindset shift her clients needed to make. The framework was already there, in her language, in her client work, in two decades of lived experience.
My job wasn't to add something new. My job was to point at what already existed and say: This is your differentiator. This is your methodology. This is what makes you different from every other career coach.
Because Tereza had spent twenty years developing this framework through actual experience. She understood what it meant to be technically brilliant but strategically invisible. She'd figured out how to cross over...from invisible expert to go-to leader. She'd developed a systematic approach to career intelligence because she'd had to navigate complex organizational politics herself.
The Data Diplomat Framework didn't need to be created.
It needed to be recognized, systematized, and positioned.
And that recognition started with a simple observation: "You've been using this language all along. Let's make it central to everything you do."
What Happened Next
Once we named it, we could see clearly what had been there all along. The Data Diplomat wasn't just a catchy label—it was the lens through which her entire methodology made sense.
But naming was just the first step in the excavation. Understanding what she was teaching was different from articulating why it mattered and how it transformed her clients' careers.
That work would unfold over the coming weeks as we dug deeper into the scattered insights, connected the patterns, and built the systematic framework around this central recognition.
Sometimes your framework isn't hiding in what you don't know.
It's hiding in the language you use when you're not trying to market yourself.
The Excavation Principle:
Your methodology already exists in the language you use when you're NOT trying to market. And sometimes it reveals itself in a single metaphor that captures years of lived experience.
Next: Chapter 3 explores how what seemed like a targeting confusion (multiple audiences) actually revealed a core principle of her methodology.
-
- Chapter 1: When Success Does Not Equal Clarity
- Chapter 2: The “Data Diplomat” Moment <<<YOU ARE HERE
- Chapter 3: The Persona Discovery
- Chapter 4: The Experience Vs. Skills Discovery
- Chapter 5: The Brutal Honesty Differentiator
- Chapter 6: Brand Promise - The North Star that guides everything
- Chapter 7: Mapping the Journey
Subscribe to my newslettter to continue reading the complete ChaosClarity™ Diary series!
See how invisible professional value gets transformed into strategic recognition through our conversations.
